The Institute of Race Relations (IRR) says the Auditor-General has come to ‘the same conclusion as the IRR – the government simply cannot control its spending’.
The IRR says in a statement that Auditor-General’s latest remarks in a recent briefing toi MPs ‘confirm the IRR’s position that government has lost control of its revenue and should be compelled to exercise discipline in using fewer financial resources to maintain adequate levels of service delivery’.
Government’s inability to manage taxes competently and efficiently is a core focus of the IRR’s current campaign to put pressure on the government to reduce spending and start using taxpayers’ money efficiently.
Highlighting the Auditor-General’s parliamentary briefing on the latest Material Irregularities in Local Government report of 2021/2022, the IRR points out that the report reveals that municipalities ‘posted a whopping R5.19bn in financial losses’.
‘Put into perspective, this is the rough equivalent of paying for 40 000 NSFAS students; or building two of eThekwini’s Dr Pixley ka Isaka Seme regional hospitals, or even fixing the entire ‘sewage lake’ that has formed outside Kimberley, all with some change left.
‘The Auditor-General reported that the losses were incurred in the procurement of goods and services paid for but not received; unfair and uncompetitive practices, and paying consultants R1.6bn (or 35% of the municipal finance staff wage bill) to do the same job staff had already been hired to do.’
The IRR notes that the Auditor-General ‘also reports that losses incurred were not limited to municipal finances and the abstractions of accounting, but impinged directly on public health in the case of 29 instances of polluted discharges into water resources as well as poor management of landfill sites’ .
‘Moreover, the Auditor-General notes that these material irregularities, though many, are representative only of the sampled municipalities of some 170 out of the total 257 municipalities countrywide.
‘The Auditor-General joins the IRR and Chief Justice Zondo in bemoaning the lack of value-for-money procurement in government, but also specifically draws attention to deficiencies in oversight at local government level.
‘National Treasury should heed the IRR’s call to cut VAT from 15% to 11.5% for the two-fold benefit of disciplining government spending by reducing the resources available to it, and of relieving the excessive financial pressure that weighs the public down, freeing people to spend the money as they choose. The added benefit of increasing the public’s spending power by reducing VAT is that it will stimulate growth by increasing consumer spending and driving prices of goods and services down. Growth will also be triggered where government runs public finances capably, minimising losses (from fruitless and wasteful expenditure) and maximising value-for-money in public procurement.’