How should principled individualists respond to the election of Donald Trump, and his firestorm of executive orders?

Although I have been an enthusiastic Trump supporter, and believe his good policies outweigh the bad, he is neither individualist nor libertarian.

Individualists believe in individual freedom, free markets, the rule of law, respect for others, property rights, and the right to self-defence. We reject the use of arbitrary coercive force by anyone, including presidents and governments.

Tariffs

Tariffs are a cornerstone of Trumpian philosophy. Tariffs are a form of government tax, a restriction on freedom of choice, and bad economics. Some hidden government official will decide what you may buy, at what price, and from whom. They will justify this by claiming to protect some uncompetitive local industry from a more competitive and cheaper external supplier, at your cost. They are overriding your discretion and freedom of choice for some nebulous advantage to a powerful lobby of local interests.

If the local industries are too useless to compete successfully, they should go out of business, not beg favours from politicians.

Americans should be eternally grateful to the Chinese for supplying them with cheap useful goods, while the US charges the Chinese a fortune for the goods at which they excel, such as high-tech software and electronics. If the Americans choose to give this technology away for free, more fool them.

In the short term, overseas suppliers will probably pay the tariffs, raise their prices and lose market share. In the medium-to-longer term they will simply find simpler and more profitable markets and cut off their supply to high-tariff regimes.

Borders

Does a nation-state have a right to aggressively defend its borders from immigrants? The answer appears to be pretty obvious. But up to two weeks ago, and for the four years prior, the US did not actively defend its borders, allowing ten million people to pass into the country. For most of its history, the US has been very open to immigrants. It does not support the defence of other borders, notably Gaza/Israel, Tibet/China, Russia-past/Russia-now.

Ferocious border enforcement has a bad history; East Germany, North Korea, even South Africa are clear historical examples. I fear Trump’s approach will be effective, but not successful in the long term.

Individualists believe in freedom for ALL people, not just citizens of particular states. Our freedom philosophy is consistent. It does not vary by geography, or skin colour, or gender. Most immigrants are just ordinary individuals desperately trying to improve their circumstances in what they perceive as a kinder country than the one they left.

Individualists believe in property rights. All free individuals are entitled to protect and defend the boundaries of their lawfully acquired property.

Deportations

Western civilised values recommend treating individuals with care and respect, independent of their circumstances. If someone is suspected of a crime, there is a large body of jurisprudence and precedent which guides how to deal with them. Deportation is an uncommon punishment because it assumes a third nation willing to take the criminal. It can easily become a nightmare of international negotiations. It is likely to become very expensive, possibly defeating the point of the exercise.

Deportations will require police raids, forced removals, detention centres, convoys. They are never good for the reputation of the enforcing country. Ask Germany, Russia, and England (in India and during the Boer War).

Abortion

Most Republicans, whom Trump now represents, oppose abortion, mainly on religious grounds. They favour the rights of the child over the rights of the mother. This issue has been delegated to the individual states, but Trump appears to oppose late term abortions.

As an individualist/libertarian, I favour the rights of the mother over those of the foetus while it is still a part of the mother’s body. For this reason, I disagree with Trump’s approach.

Death Penalty

An executive order signed by President Trump directs the Department of Justice to pursue the death penalty in some specific cases.

As an individualist, I do not believe in the death penalty. It is uncivilised, irreversible, and inhumane. Even the ANC rejects the death penalty. This order will not enhance America’s image in the civilised world.

Freedom of expression

An executive order directs that new federal buildings must follow traditional, classical architecture. The state has no business policing speech, style, thought or fashion. This is Orwellian, and much to be feared. Will US citizens have their attire, food choices, purchases, decided by government fiat? Shame on Trump.

Pricing

Another Trump executive order states: “Agencies must deliver emergency price relief.” Lenin, and just about every other socialist leader, has issued a similar declaration. In a free market, which individualists favour, prices are not set by government fiat, but by market forces. This is a slippery slope to socialism.

Conclusion

Biden and the Democrats presided over a hellscape of insane laws for the past four years. Anything else would be better. Most of the executive orders are common sense and will improve the life of US citizens. But there are some serious flaws and anomalies which I allude to above. Like the decor in many of his hotels, Trump’s Golden Age may end up being a veneer.

The views of the writer are not necessarily the views of the Daily Friend or the IRR.

If you like what you have just read, support the Daily Friend


contributor

Trevor Watkins is the founder of the Individualist Movement, the author of two books, and a contributing author for the Free Market Foundation. He publishes on a blog at libertarian.org.za.